Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHelliwell, Richard
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Carol
dc.contributor.authorJones, Stephen
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-19T07:04:30Z
dc.date.available2022-08-19T07:04:30Z
dc.date.created2022-05-04T08:50:32Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0038-0199
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3012611
dc.description.abstractThe desire to govern antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in animal agriculture has gained renewed prominence in the UK and international policy and practice in response to growing concern about the impact of AMR infections on human and animal health. This article adopts a more-than-human approach inspired by assemblage and biopolitical thinking to explore how diverse actors work to assemble a regime of governance in animal agriculture through their efforts to tackle AMR. How agricultural animals are represented and positioned in this process, and the consequences of these efforts for broader agricultural animal–human relation in UK animal agriculture is also a concern. Qualitative, empirical material is produced from documents published by government, industry organisations, NGOs and retailers. We highlight the negotiated contingencies of actions on AMR in UK animal agriculture and reflect on the limited extent to which they constitute a new front in the regulation of agricultural animals.
dc.description.abstractAssembling antimicrobial resistance governance in UK animal agriculture
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titleAssembling antimicrobial resistance governance in UK animal agriculture
dc.title.alternativeAssembling antimicrobial resistance governance in UK animal agriculture
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.source.journalSociologia Ruralis
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/soru.12377
dc.identifier.cristin2021237
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel