Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHårstad, Renate Marie Butli
dc.contributor.authorVik, Jostein
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-31T07:12:45Z
dc.date.available2022-08-31T07:12:45Z
dc.date.created2022-08-29T10:50:21Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn2380-6567
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3014591
dc.description.abstractIn this article, we draw from qualitative interviews with political parties' representatives and a content analysis of party programs to identify how political parties frame animal welfare policies in Norway. In analyzing the framing of animal welfare and its significance for understanding agricultural post-exceptionalism, we found that though they frame animal welfare issues in conflicting ways, most see Norwegian animal welfare as reasonably good but perceive potential for improvement. They also generally understand societal claims as lacking or having an unclear factual basis, which has legitimized their nonaction as political parties. Even so, because of active new actors such as animal welfare organizations and retailers, the parties do not believe that public pressure will wane. Although introducing new farm animal welfare policies can represent a move towards post-exceptionalism in Europe's agri-food sector, the discourse on animal welfare policies amongst political parties implies that such is not the case in Norway.
dc.description.abstractPolitical parties' framing of farm animal welfare: A fragmented picture
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titlePolitical parties' framing of farm animal welfare: A fragmented picture
dc.title.alternativePolitical parties' framing of farm animal welfare: A fragmented picture
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.source.journalEuropean Policy Analysis
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/epa2.1154
dc.identifier.cristin2046608
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record